Censuring (peer) censorship

taped mouth
Photo credit: Forbes

There’s been a lot of talk about social media censorship lately. In late May, President Trump issued the Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship, a declaration that has no legal effect—yet.

I’m not here to argue the Executive Order’s vices and virtues. I’ll leave that to the scholars and pundits. I am here, however, to talk about an accepted form of censorship that seems to be growing.

Intolerance

Censorship is something, I think we’d all agree, that’s not right and goes against what the United States is founded upon. It’s something our country has fought against for most of its history. You don’t have to look far to find people expressing anti-censorship sentiment.

While big-company and governmental censorship is widely thought of as wrong, there’s another type of censorship that’s common, practiced often, and, by association, accepted. To coin a phrase, let’s call this practice peer censorship. I touched on an example of it in my last post. Basically, this form of censorship involves the deleting of a comment from a social media post that expresses a differing opinion.

There are times when peer censorship is necessary, such as when a comment contains offensive, vulgar, or indecent sentiments and wording. However, a comment that expresses a differing or unpopular opinion does not automatically qualify as offensive, vulgar, or indecent.

It’s easy to beat our chests and cry foul at the people and organizations we think are censoring people, but do we feel the same about intolerant peer censorship?

On our own social media posts, we are the publisher and editor of that post, vested with the power to silence (delete) differing opinions or accept them as an opportunity for a civil, respectful, and tolerant conversation.

Somewhere along the way, it became common for people to see differing opinions as personal affronts.

The peers who censored me on social media are individuals who call for equality and tolerance in many of their posts. Ironically, it’s these things—the ones they claim to want—that seem to escape them in dealing with differing opinions on a post they’ve made.

What can you do?

While we can’t immediately control the censorship practices of social media outlets and the media, we can immediately control unnecessary censorship on our own social media pages. If you oppose censorship on a grand scale, you should oppose it on a personal scale, as well.

Tolerance and civility cannot prevail if we, on a personal level, are unwilling to be civil towards and tolerant of differing opinions. If someone makes a comment you don’t agree with and that doesn’t cross the line of decency, do the tolerable and civil thing: leave the comment there. There’s probably something you can learn from that person’s point of view. If not, agree to disagree and move on with tolerance and civility. Plain and simple.

One thought on “Censuring (peer) censorship

  1. I think the speed at which a lot of posts can go from playing devils advocate to straight up bullying prevents a lot of people from posting their views or even allowing others to do so… nip it in the bud kind of thing. Then of course there are people who don’t like to have their ideas challenged at all like you’ve mentioned…

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Corporate to Casa Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s